the summary of this case is that the 4th amedment was not broken. the cops have the right to search a vehical without a warrent and take what they find for evidence.the liquor that was seized was used for the conviction to the ones who transported it to a dry state or dry city.
the court said it broke the national prohibition act and the two vehcials that the liquor was found had 68 quarts of wiskey and gin. the defendents made a motion to have the liquor retuned to the defendant carroll who owned the vehcial.
I agree with the court system because anyone who has liquor in a vehcial has a chance to drink and drive and the court ruled in the favor and arrested carroll
AP USH 9/5/18
6 years ago
No comments:
Post a Comment